Legal Opinion

United States v. Hermilo Zamudio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2015No. 13-10322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

Zamudio was convicted of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which prohibits a deported alien from being “found in” the United States after reentering without permission. Zamudio now appeals from his conviction, arguing that the underlying removal proceeding violated his due process rights, that the district court erred in failing to instruct the jury on a constructive knowledge theory for Zamudio’s statute of limitations defense, and that the evidence presented to the jury proved his statute of limitations defense as a matter of law. We have jurisdiction pursuant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Nelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Santiago-Rodriguez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Hermilo ZamudioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API