Legal Opinion
Taylor v. LSI Corp. of America
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 2011No. A09-1410PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Respondent LeAnn Taylor’s employment with appellant LSI Corporation of America (LSI) was terminated after her husband was forced to resign his employment as president of LSI. Taylor filed a lawsuit against LSI claiming marital status discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. ch. 363A (2010) (MHRA). The district court granted summary judgment to LSI, dismissing Taylor’s claims on the grounds that existing case law requires a plaintiff claiming “marital status” discrimination to allege that the termination was a “direct attack on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Cummings v. KoehnenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Kraft, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Timothy Skalsky v. Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Aase v. Wapiti Meadows Community Technologies & Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Guardianship of DurandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.