Burton v. Huma
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
In Equity. On plea and exceptions to answer.
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
This case stands on a plea and exceptions to the answer-The facts, as developed, are these: In 1884 one Rufus Clark was the owner of the real estate in question. He sold and conveyed it to Henry and Loveland for the sum of $70,000, of wliich $10,000 was paid in cash, and a trust deed given for the balance to two trustees. A few.hundred'dollars only having been paid upon this balance, the trustees, at the request of Clark, advertised the property for sale, and sold the entire tract to Clark for $76,800. In pursuance of that sale a deed was made to Clark, who subsequently conveyed it to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grafton v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Farrar v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Fox v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Barton v. McWhinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sweeney v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Stuart v. Colorado Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Beezley v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Hanley v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Colburn v. DorticSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.