Sweeney v. Hanley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Idaho.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
In the case of Hanley v. Sweeny et al., 109 Fed. 712, 48 C. C. A. 612, it was here adjudged, among other things, that the deed from Hanley to Sweeney and Clark, the predecessors in interest of the Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Company, for his undivided one-eighth interest in the Skookum mine, was never in fact delivered, but was gotten possession of by Clark and Sweeney without consideration, and in fraud of Hanley’s rights, and that it was accordingly void and of no effect. After the cause was returned to the court below for further proceedings not inconsistent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Dowell v. ApplegateSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- U.S. Philips Corp. v. KBC Bank N.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Fay Heasley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.