Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Beatty
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1902No. 820PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
The case of Kennedy J. Hanley, complainant, against Charles Sweeny, F. Lewis Clark, and the Empire State-Idaho Mining & Development Company, a corporation, defendants, was a suit in equity, brought in the circuit court of the United *60States for the district of Idaho, Northern division, on the 18th day of March, 1899. The suit involved complainant’s claim to the ownership •of eleven twenty-fourths of certain mining ground described as the "Skookum Mining Claim,” located in the Yreka mining district, in the county of Shoshone, in the state of Idaho. The complainant’s right…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dowell v. ApplegateSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Burton v. HumaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1889
- Hanley v. SweenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sweeney v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Mercelis v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1912