Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Colorado Eastern Railroad

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 3, 1916No. 8229PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Geo. W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, J.

1. The purpose and object of this action is to compel payment for a strip of land taken and used as a right of way for a railroad over land commonly known as the IlifF tract situated in the county of Denver; to recover compensation for damages to the residue not taken, and payment for loss of the use of the land since the taking, occasioned thereby. Information upon the history of the tract and regarding the status of the title may be obtained by reference to the following cases: Warren v. Adams, 19 Colo. 515, 36 Pac. 604; Adams v. Warren, 27 Colo. 293, 61 Pac. 609; People v. Carpenter, 29…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Farrar v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Ossman v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Application of Bubb v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. State, Department of Health v. the MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Rogers v. Lower Clear Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API