Legal Opinion
Lee Yeager v. General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2001No. 18-3796PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
When Lee Yeager (‘Yeager”) was not selected for General Motors Corporation’s (“GMC’s”) apprentice program he sued, alleging that GMC discriminated against him on the basis of his race and sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The district court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of GMC.
On appeal, Yeager argues that the district court erred when it determined that he lacked standing to make his Title VII race and sex discrimination claims against GMC and that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ralphael Okoro v. William CallaghanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- John C. Briggs v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Wayne Henschel v. Clare County Road CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Cotter v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Nunez v. FCI ElktonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.