Legal Opinion
Nunez v. FCI Elkton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2002No. 01-3970PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Eduardo Nunez, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 397, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
*725Seeking injunctive relief and payment of court costs,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Banks v. ElliotDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Bonaparte v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Bond v. TreeceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Chapple, Jr. v. Unknown OfficersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Choina v. Ohio Department of TaxationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.