Legal Opinion
Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 4, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-1709PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GARY L. LANCASTER, Chief Judge.
This is an environmental law action. Plaintiffs, Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar Corporation (collectively, “Trinity”) bring federal claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., and the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq.1 Trinity also brings state claims under Pennsylvania’s Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act (“HSCA”), 35 Pa.Stat. § 6020.101, et seq., and various common law and contract theories. Trinity alleges that it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Clean Harbors, Inc. v. CBS Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Community Ass'n for Restoration of the Environment, Inc. v. George & Margaret LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- Marcas, L.L.C. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Greenlease Holding Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014