Legal Opinion

Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 2007No. 05-4743PublishedCited by 523 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

The issue before us is whether the District Court properly applied the McDonnell Douglas paradigm in granting summary judgment for the defendant/appellee United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in the claim brought by plaintiff/appellant Richard Wishkin (“Wishkin”) under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

I

Wishkin is a fifty-eight year old mentally disabled man who was hired by the USPS in 1969 under a federal program aimed at employing adults with disabilities. After a three-year trial period, Wishkin became a permanent employee as a mail handler. The only incident on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by523 opinions

  1. Klein v. MadisonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. v. Township of Mount HollyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Noble v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. GMAC Inc. v. Coley (In Re Coley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Rubano v. Farrell Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

518 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API