Legal Opinion
Coppola v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 26, 2013No. 1:11-cv-1257 AWI DLBPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS & MOTION TO JOIN NECESSARY PART
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
This is an environmental law case that arises from the chemical contamination of *1004property associated with a dry cleaning business. Plaintiffs (collectively “Coppola”) have brought suit against the City of Visalia (“the City”), and the California Water Service Company (“Cal Water”), and owners and former owners of nearby properties, including Martin and Martin Properties (“Martin”). The active complaint is the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). The TAC alleges 15 causes of action: (1)…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Tesoro Ref. & Mktg. Co. v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Oahu Air Conditioning Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.