Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Greenlease Holding Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
The instant action arises out of the contamination of real property caused by the use of hazardous substances and waste in connection with the operation of a railcar manufacturing facility. Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF Nos. 143 & 151.) For the reasons that follow, each of those motions will be granted in part and denied in part.
II. Background
A. General
In 1910, Greenville Metal Products Company (“GMPC”) purchased the North Plant, which…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blettner Avenue, LLC v. Rental Uniform Service, Inc. and Cintas CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. U.S.A. LAMP AND BALLAST RECYCLING, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023