Rawlins v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County ; J. C. Robberts, Judge. xVetion by J. J. Rawlins and others against tbe Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Company and others. Judgment for defendants; and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This was instituted on January 9, 1916, by the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter styled plaintiffs, against the defendants in error, hereinafter styled defendants, to enjoin the collection of certain paving assessments in the city of Enid. The defendants had judgment, and plaintiffs prosecute this proceeding in error to reverse the same.
On January 10, 1910, the city commissioners of the city of Enid adopted the preliminary resolution of necessity to pave the streets in the paving district herein involved. The sufficiency of the preliminary resolution is not attacked by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- White v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Newman v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.