Newman v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County : J. C. Robberts, Judge. Action for injunction by E. E. Newman and others against Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Company and others. Judgment for defendants, denying the injunction, and plaintiffs ;>3*ing error.
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiffs in error, in the district court of Garfield county, to enjoin the collection of certain paving assessments in the city of Enid. Judgment was for the defendants denying the injunction.
Two reasons are urged for reversing the judgment of the court below: First, that proof of the publication of the initial resolution for paying was insufficient, in failing to show that it was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city of Enid, and which paper had been published for 52 consecutive weeks; second, that the court erred in not permitting the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Board of Com'rs of Garfield Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Alley v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- City of Bartlesville v. KeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. LuteyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.