Giroux v. Lussier
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.
Both parties to this controversy are real estate brokers. The plaintiff seeks recovery on a claim that the defendant fraudulently interfered with his brokerage contract with the owner and seller of a farm in Newport, Vermont. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. This appeal by the plaintiff challenges several subordinate rulings, but the principal question concerns the directed verdict. To test that ruling, the facts are related without regard to conflicts in the evidence, but according to the full strength of the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. PerlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Mitchell v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- St. Johnsbury & Lake Champlain R. R. v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
- M. E. Walbridge Agency, Inc. v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Williams v. Chittenden Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Juster Associates v. City Of RutlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Giroux v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Juster Associates v. City of RutlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.