Legal Opinion

M. E. Walbridge Agency, Inc. v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1962No. 1021PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

The plaintiff is a real estate broker. He is seeking to collect a commission which he says is due him. In support of his action, at the trial below, he presented evidence tending to show that early in 1956 Mr. Hinsman, president of the defendant hospital, contacted him and said that the hospital had decided to sell a certain business block which it owned in the city of Rutland and would the plaintiff be interested in trying to find a buyer. The plaintiff’s reply was that he would be interested on a standard commission basis of 5%. In the course of this talk, it was brought out by Mr. Hinsman…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. WoosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  2. Andrews v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Foster and Gridley v. WinnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Giroux v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. Nauceder v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  4. Bryant v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Kelly v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API