Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Aldrich
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 6, 1960No. 35PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
The plaintiffs seek recovery for wrongful interference with contract relations. They claim the defendants deprived them of an advantageous agreement to purchase a herd of dairy cattle. The trial court withheld the case from the jury by directing a verdict of no liability. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment for the defendants that was entered on this ruling.
There was some conflict in the testimony given at the trial. Resolving this conflict in favor of the claim as we are required from the error assigned, this is the plaintiff’s version of the controversy.
Prior to the sale of the cattle…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.