Legal Opinion

Juster Associates v. City of Rutland

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 12, 1990No. 579, Docket 89-7747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

This antitrust action pits developers who are seeking permits necessary to begin construction of a new shopping mall against the owners of an existing mall who possess permits allowing them to double its size. The novel aspect of this not-unusual scenario is that the existing mall is accusing its as-yet non-existent competitor of monopolistic practices.

Two New York partnerships that wish to expand their shopping mall in Rutland, Vermont have sued the City of Rutland and several prospective developers of a new shopping center in the Rutland area, claiming that the City…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doron Precision Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Abdush-Shahid v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
  3. Official Publications, Inc. v. Kable News Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. Juster Associates v. City Of RutlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API