Bogseth v. Emanuel
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
In these consolidated appeals, we are asked to determine whether a fictitious "John Doe” may properly be considered a "named defendant” under section 2 — 402 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2— 402 (West 1992)), the respondent in discovery statute.
BACKGROUND
No. 77280
Rosalie Bogseth, on behalf of her minor son, Joseph A. Bogseth, filed a complaint naming as the sole defendant a fictitious individual called "John Doe” and 28 other parties as respondents in discovery. The complaint alleged that, after Joseph’s birth, he suffered respiratory distress which the respondents in discovery…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LogstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Elg v. WhittingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Guertin v. GuertinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Ohio Millers Mutual Insurance v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Illinois Automobile ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Bogseth v. EmanuelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Exelon Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Harris v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of West ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Department of Transportation v. Drury Displays, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.