Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Logston

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1984No. 58631PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ryan

The central issue in this case is whether our personal property exemption statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 110, par. 12 — 1001) constitutes a defense to a contempt order that was issued to enforce a maintenance obligation in a dissolution-of-marriage case. Eugene Logston appeals from orders of the circuit court of St. Clair County that were issued during proceedings instituted by his former wife, Kate Logston. To enforce the maintenance provision of their dissolution-of-marriage judgment, Kate initiated contempt proceedings against Eugene. Eugene answered Kate’s petition for rule to show…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. BoykinIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Andrews v. FoxworthyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kerner v. State Employees' Retirement System of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People Ex Rel. Schwartz v. FagerholmIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Sullivan v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. County of Du Page v. Graham, Anderson, Probst & White, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. West v. KirkhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In the Matter of Richard E. BARKER, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API