Legal Opinion

Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of West Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 2005No. 2—03—1392, 2—04—0575 consPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

These consolidated appeals each involve a challenge to a City of West Chicago (City) zoning ordinance that was amended on October 19, 1992, to ban certain commercial and noncommercial off-premises advertising structures, including all billboards. The amended ordinance provided for a seven-year “amortization” period, or grace period, for removing existing nonconforming structures or making them compliant with the ordinance. The ordinance did not provide for the compensation of an individual who lost the right to display a sign.

Plaintiffs allege that they lawfully erected billboards before the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Weatherman v. Gary-Wheaton Bank of Fox Valley, N.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Tortoriello v. Gerald Nissan of North Aurora, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Griffin v. WilloughbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. BETTER GOVERNMENT ASS'N v. BlagojevichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API