Legal Opinion

Bogseth v. Emanuel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1994No. 1-92-1385PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

This cause is before us on an interlocutory appeal certified to this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill. 2d R. 308). At issue is whether plaintiff’s medical malpractice complaint, which named as the only defendant "John Doe” and named numerous health care providers as respondents in discovery, satisfies the requirements of the respondents in discovery statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 2—402). The trial court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the action, and they appeal.

The relevant facts are as follows. On July 20, 1990, plaintiff, Larry Bogseth, Jr., a minor, by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. In Re Marriage of LogstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bogseth v. EmanuelIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Robinson v. Johnson Supplemental opinion upon denial of rehearing - filed March 25, 2004 - added to end of this opinionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Coyne v. OSF Healthcare SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Zunamon v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Hunt Ex Rel. Chiovari v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API