Borough of Wilkinsburg v. Trumbull-Denton Joint Venture
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment in the amount of $75,276.60 for breach of a contract provision requiring Trumbull-Denton Joint Venture (Trumbull) to obtain insurance covering the Borough of Wilkinsburg. We affirm.
In early 1981, Trumbull was selected by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation as the general contractor for rehabilitation of 1-376. To discharge its responsibility for handling traffic affected by the contract work, Trumbull entered into an agreement with Wilkinsburg to use off-duty borough police officers to regulate traffic which was rerouted through…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- POTOCZNY v. VallejoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hagan Lumber Co. v. Duryea School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. MelcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Zortman v. Volk Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Precision Door Co., Inc. v. Meridian Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Zurich-American Insurance v. EckertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.