Legal Opinion

Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Klein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1956No. Appeal, No. 18PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This action in equity involves the application of the doctrines of “unjust enrichment” and “restitution.”

The lower court found, upon ample evidence, that the defendants, appellants, sold certain real estate to a purchaser under general warranty deed, warranting that the property was free and clear of any incumbrances. The attorney who searched the title for the purchaser failed to discover the liens of certain unpaid taxes against the property for years prior to the date of purchase. Subsequently the purchaser, who was threatened with a tax sale, paid the delinquent taxes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Memmert v. McKeenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Henry Shenk Co. v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Moses v. Ferrel & Indemnity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Vaughn v. DidizianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Kramer v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API