Zortman v. Volk Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Babdrige, J.,
The defendants conceded that they had not paid five hundred ($500) dollars, the sum sued for, under an agreement whereby they purchased a lot of ground with a dwelling erected thereon. They set up a counterclaim of twenty-three hundred ninety-four dollars and' seventy-four cents ($2,394.74) for damages due to the neglect of the plaintiff to assign a twenty-five hundred ($2,500) dollar policy in the Superior Fire Insurance Company in accordance with his agreement, in addition to the sixty-five hundred ($6,500) dollar policy that was assigned.
About two weeks after the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hagan Lumber Co. v. Duryea School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Billmeyer, Dill & Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Dodd v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Mayhew v. GlazierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Shoenfeld v. FleisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Aresto v. MilieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Borough of Wilkinsburg v. Trumbull-Denton Joint VentureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Valley Industrial Trucks, Inc. v. R. D. Werner Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1973