Legal Opinion

Zortman v. Volk Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1929No. Appeal 97PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Babdrige, J.,

The defendants conceded that they had not paid five hundred ($500) dollars, the sum sued for, under an agreement whereby they purchased a lot of ground with a dwelling erected thereon. They set up a counterclaim of twenty-three hundred ninety-four dollars and' seventy-four cents ($2,394.74) for damages due to the neglect of the plaintiff to assign a twenty-five hundred ($2,500) dollar policy in the Superior Fire Insurance Company in accordance with his agreement, in addition to the sixty-five hundred ($6,500) dollar policy that was assigned.

About two weeks after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hagan Lumber Co. v. Duryea School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Billmeyer, Dill & Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Dodd v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Mayhew v. GlazierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Shoenfeld v. FleisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Aresto v. MilieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Borough of Wilkinsburg v. Trumbull-Denton Joint VentureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Valley Industrial Trucks, Inc. v. R. D. Werner Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API