Legal Opinion

POTOCZNY v. Vallejo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1952No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

' Henry Potoczny brought an action of trespass against the defendant for personal injuries received by him while he was on duty with the Bureau of Fire of the City of Philadelphia. The defendant was duly served with the complaint which claimed, inter alia, for loss of wages during- his incapacity. The City of Philadelphia, intervened as a party plaintiff or' use-plain tiff, for the reason that under the Act of 1935, P: :L. 477, as amended,-53 PS- §327, it was required to pay the plaintiff fireman, injured in the course of his employment, his regular wages during the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Insurance Co. of N. A. v. Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Gildner v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. First National Bank of Ashley v. ReilySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Meehan v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. City of Birmingham v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. School District v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API