Legal Opinion

Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1946No. , 34,065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment or a new trial in an action for damages to plaintiffs’ automobile truck arising out of a collision with a streetcar at a street intersection in Minneapolis.

On a prior appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial after the court had directed a verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiffs’ case, a new trial was granted. Nees v. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co. 218 Minn. 532, 16 N. W. (2d) 758.

In the instant case, defendant as well as plaintiffs presented evidence, and the resulting disputed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. State v. PrickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SchabertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Sylvester Bros. Development Co. v. Great Central Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. In Re Estate of BoysenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Thompson v. BoysenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Sylvester Bros. Development Co. v. Great Central Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API