Goldman v. Christy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
On February 26, 1917, plaintiff commenced an action against the Minneapolis Copper Company, a South Dakota corporation, to recover $8,500 on a promissory note. On September 8, 1920, plaintiff took judgment by default for $7,001.09 and thereafter execution was issued thereon and returned unsatisfied.
*92On March 6,1919, Ole Lee, a judgment creditor of the copper company, commenced an action, on behalf of himself and all other creditors of the copper company, “to sequestrate the stock, property and things in action and effects” of the company within the state of Minnesota, to appoint a receiver for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodward v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Firehammer v. Interstate Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Zander v. AffeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925