Legal Opinion

Izlar v. Manchester & Augusta R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Before Gage, J., Orangeburg, September term, 1899. Action by William V. Izlar against Manchester and Augusta R. R. Co. Defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Before Gage, J., Orangeburg, September term, 1899. Action by William V. Izlar against Manchester and Augusta R. R. Co. Defendant appeals. R. R. Co. is not liable for damages happening outside of its property, over which it has no control: 34 S. C., 451; 26 la., 24; 59 Me., 183; 22 Ore., 430; 68 Tex., 342; 69 Me., 640. No error to refzise request containing unsound propositions: 36 S. C., 371; 43 S. C., 146; 52 S. C., 224. Hozv misstatement of issues are to be corrected: 35 S. C.; 459. Plaintiff not a trespasser, but company zvas under obligation to him to keep its approaches in good…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice} Popé.

The plaintiff brought his action against the defendant to recover $5,000 damages for breaking his leg and his ankle, through defendant’s failure to keep safe its way of egress and ingress to its station in the city of Orangeburg, S. C., on the night of the third of December, 1897, where the plaintiff was endeavoring, in the darkness of the night, with no lights on defendant’s premises, to reach such station to receive his wife and daughter, who were passengers on defendant’s train, which was scheduled to and did arrive at such station…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doss v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. McKone v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. T. & P. R'y Co. v. BestTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hamilton v. Texas & Pacific R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Penny Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Reid v. TopperArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API