Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Geiger
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 22, 2015No. Case No. 3:13cv1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This is a civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following a nighttime encounter with law enforcement officers from several agencies, plaintiffs seek damages *708for violations of their First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Pending are plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint, (Doc. 80), and defendants’ motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 66, 67, 69; 77). For the reasons that follow: 1) I deny plaintiffs’ motion; and 2) I grant defendants’ motions in part and deny them in part.
Background
The parties vigorously dispute the facts of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jacob Clark v. Bernadette StoneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Mark Crawford v. Donavin GeigerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Clark v. StoneDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Craft v. BillingsleaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Dyer v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.