Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 23, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00921Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DUSTIN DYER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-921 SHIRRELLIA SMITH, et al., Defendants. OPINION The plaintiff, Dustin Dyer, alleges that the defendants, both TSA agents, violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights when they stopped him from recording a pat-down search of his husband and ordered him to delete the video he had already taken. The defendants, Shirrellia Smith and Natalie Staton, argue that Dyer’s claims fail because he lacks an implied right of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API