Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Milner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2012No. DA 11-0464PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 Appellants Neil and Seth Milner appeal from the District Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District’s grant of a mandatory injunction, abatement, and $10,000 damages to Appellee Gary Olsen (Olsen) for his claims of private nuisance and trespass.

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 Issue one: Did the District Court err in determining that Olsen’s claims were not barred by res judicata?

¶4 Issue two: Did the District Court err in determining that Olsen’s claims were not barred by equitable estoppel or waiver?

¶5 Issue three: Did the District Court err in determining that Milner was liable to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Turner v. Mountain Engineering & Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Murphy Homes, Inc. v. MullerMontana Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Alleyne v. Diageo USVI, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  4. Varano v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hartsoe v. ChristopherMontana Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API