Legal Opinion

In re B.P.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2001No. 00-836PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 R.P. appeals from the Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order entered by the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, adjudicating B.P. and A.P. as youths in need of care, placing their care and custody with their natural father, T.P., and suspending R.P.’s contact with the children until she submits to ongoing psychological treatment. We affirm.

¶2 R.P. raises the following issues:

¶3 1. Is the District Court’s placement of the children with T.P. barred by the doctrine of res judicata?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in refusing to remove the guardian ad litem?

¶5 3. Did…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Johansen v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Small v. McRaeMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re Declaring D.H.Montana Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of McMahonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hawkins v. HarneyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re the Marriage of ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Riggs v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API