Faulks v. Schrider
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
In 1936 the Commissioners of the District of Columbia commenced ,a proceeding in the court below to condemn land necessary for the extension of 8th Street, Jackson Street, and Kearney Street, in the City of Washington. The condemnation statute of the District of Columbia1 provides that whenever property is taken for the opening of a street, benefits, so-called, shall be assessed against the neighboring property in an amount equal to the damages awarded for the land condemned, the result being that the cost of condemnation is borne by the landowners and not by the municipality. Appellants own…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Banks v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Dickinson v. Arkansas City Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goldman v. QuadratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Hawe v. HaweIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Faulks v. SchriderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Henry v. BorushkoWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Zlotnick v. Jack I. Bender & Sons, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.