Legal Opinion

Faulks v. Schrider

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 28, 1940No. 7393PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

The appeal is from a judgment of the District Court holding that plaintiff Francis J. Schrider, trustee, has title to disputed land by adverse possession and is therefore entitled to a condemnation award from the District.

The disputed tract of land may be designated briefly as lot 803. In 1893 it was part of a large tract known as “West Brook-land” held by Thomas Armat and John M. Comstock as trustees under a development project. By deed of July 27, 1897, Armat and Comstock conveyed parts of “West Brookland” (specifically, block 23 and lots 7 to 11 inclusive in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Holtzman v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Kidd v. BrowneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R. A. Beaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Klimkiewicz v. Westminster Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Lawrence M. Gary and Margaret W. Gary v. Ernest B. Dane, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Beverages International, Ltd. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Weis v. KozakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API