Henry v. Borushko
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[11] Appellants, James and Barbara Henry, and Appellees, George and Lucille Borushko, own adjoining properties in Fremont County, Wyoming. An irrigation canal separates the properties. In 2009, a dispute developed over the boundary between their properties. The Borushkos asserted that the boundary was the centerline of the irrigation canal. The Henrys claimed that it was at the fence along the north bank of the canal. Litigation ensued. The district court ruled in favor of the Borushkos. The Henrys appealed. We will affirm.
ISSUE
[12] The issue is whether the deed to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rouse v. MunroeWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Coumas v. Transcontinental Garage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Kinstler v. RTB SOUTH GREELEY, LTD. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Glover v. GiraldoWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Halvorson v. Sweetwater County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Bischoff v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Ettinger v. Oyster Bay II Cmty. Prop. Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018