Legal Opinion

West v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Arthur West, an Olympia, Washington resident, uses marijuana for medical purposes but objects to the wider use and distribution of “recreational” marijuana authorized by his home state’s recently enacted Initiative 502 (“1-502”). To combat this initiative, West sued several state- and federal-government defendants, arguing (among other things) that the Department of Justice’s stance toward Washington’s marijuana legislation “[rose] to the level of substantial and expressive harm to the structure of federalism in violation…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur West v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. West v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Barker v. ConroyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. Barker v. ConroyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Steve Baumgarten v. Seattle Police DeptCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API