Legal Opinion

Barker v. Conroy

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 11, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16–850 (RMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge

Since the Continental Congress met in 1774, the States' representatives to the federal government have employed, and paid, clergy who perform as chaplains and offer a daily prayer before each session begins. Daniel Barker, an atheist and co-President of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, challenges the modern practice in the House of Representatives, whereby he was denied the opportunity to be a guest chaplain and to deliver a secular invocation in lieu of a prayer. Mr. Barker asserts that the Supreme Court's decision in Town of Greece, New…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniel Barker v. Patrick ConroyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Fields v. Speaker of the Pa. House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Lee v. BarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. Lee v. BarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API