Legal Opinion

Arthur West v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 18, 2017No. 15-5107PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The Constitution limits our “judicial Power” to “Cases” and “Controversies,” U.S. Const, art. Ill, § 2, cl. 1, and there is no justiciable case or controversy unless the plaintiff has standing, Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 102, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998). To stave off dismissal for lack of standing, the plaintiff must sufficiently allege a “concrete and particularized” injury that is “fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant” and “likely” to be “redressed by a favorable decision.” Lujan v. Defenders…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election IntegrityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Gvt. Province of Manitoba v. David BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  4. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. US Department of Commerce and Bureau of the CensusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Abulhawa v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API