Legal Opinion
State v. Pixler
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 2010No. 20090310, 20090311PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mathew Pixler appeals from criminal judgments entered after he pled guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia and to ingesting a controlled substance. Pixler argues the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, because he was not capable of making a voluntary, intelligent, and knowing plea. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On July 27, 2009, Pixler was arrested and charged with ingesting a controlled substance in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-22.3, a class A misdemeanor,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Donald A. Dorsey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- State v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GunwallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MortrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. MittleiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GressNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Interest of A.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MackeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.