Legal Opinion

State v. Trask

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 7, 2000No. 24269-9-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

In the first appeal of this condemnation case, 1 we ruled in part that Russell J. Trask was entitled to interest on an award of “just compensation.” We did not address how such interest should be calculated, and that question gives rise to this second appeal.

In January 1994, the State sued to condemn land owned by Trask. The State agreed to pay $2.5 million in exchange for immediate possession and use. The State and Trask also agreed that if a jury later valued the land at more than $2.5 million, the amount by which the jury’s award exceeded $2.5 million would bear simple interest at 12…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Commissioner v. RissCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CITY OF PUYALLUP v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. City of Puyallup v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Lambert v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (In Re Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  5. Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API