Lambert v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (In Re Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MARGARET H. MURPHY, Bankruptcy Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. INTRODUCTION ..841
II. FINDINGS OF FACT.842
A. Background of the Private-Label Baby Diaper Business Weyerhaeuser Transferred to Paragon in the IPO .842
B. The IPO.850
C. Paragon After The IPO .852
D. Paragon Is Driven To Bankruptcy By Intellectual Property Inadequacies.854
E. Paragon’s Losses For Which Plaintiff Seeks Damages.855
1. Bankruptcy-Related Costs.855
2. Product Re-Design Costs.855
3. Lost Profits.855
4. Obligations Incurred To PG And KC .856
a. PG obligations.856
b. KC obligations.858
c.…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeHart v. HomEq Servicing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014