Legal Opinion

CITY OF PUYALLUP v. Hogan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 16, 2012No. 41017-6-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

277 P.3d 49 (2012)

CITY OF PUYALLUP, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff,

v.

Carl R. HOGAN, a married man, as his separate estate; Carl R. Hogan and Jane Doe Hogan, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; Qwest Corporation, a Colorado corporation, successor in interest to Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Washington corporation; Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington corporation, on its own behalf and as successor in interest to Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation; Fruitland Mutual Water Company, a Washington nonprofit corporation; Kitsap…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 2 of Pac. Cnty., Mun. Corp. v. Comcast of Wash. Iv, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. First American Bank Group, Ltd. v. Iowa Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  4. Pud No. 2 Of Pacific County v. Comcast And CenturytelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Pud Utility Dist. No. 2 Of Pacific Cty v. Comcast Of Wa, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API