Legal Opinion

Folsom v. County of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1988No. 54762-9PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Callow, J. —

This case concerns the proper method of assessing property subject to a long-term commercial lease. We reaffirm our prior holding, Folsom v. County of Spokane, 106 Wn.2d 760, 725 P.2d 987 (1986), that both the lessor's and the lessee's interests should be valued by adding the capitalized value of the contract rent to the present value of the leasehold bonus.

Facts

The underlying facts are undisputed and are set forth in the stipulated facts, dated March 27, 1987, and in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, dated April 9, 1987, generally, as follows:

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Trimble v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Adamson v. TraylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. FIRST SMALL BUSINESS INV. CO. OF CA. v. Intercapital Corp. of OregonWashington Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API