Legal Opinion
Gardner v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 11, 2010No. 2:09-cv-00744PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS *
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., District Judge.
On October 2, 2009, Defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (“AHMSI”) and AHMSI Default Services, Inc. (“AHMSI Default”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) in which they seek an order dismissing the seven claims alleged against them in Plaintiffs first amended complaint. (Docket No. 42.) For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and DENIED IN PART.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
A Rule 12(b)(6) motion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- D. Neubronner v. Michael R. MilkenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davidson v. Seterus, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. KmiecikAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Dougherty v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Avila v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.