Legal Opinion
Zamani v. Carnes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2007No. 04-17571PublishedCited by 289 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
Appellants H. Gene Carnes, Phillip Carnes, Jennifer Carnes, Kathryn Schal-ler, and Kevin Schaller (“the Carneses”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to strike and/ or dismiss and- their motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
In January 2000, the Carneses, who were residents of Nevada, commenced a declaratory judgment action against appel-lees, California residents Michael A. Zama-ni and Nancy Miller-Wallaee, who was then married to Mr. Zamani and known as Nancy Zamani (“the Zamanis”). The Carneses…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Arlene C. Wolf-Lillie v. Gerald M. Sonquist, Kenosha County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by289 opinions
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Doug Greisen v. Jon HankenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Little v. GoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Cindy F. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.