Legal Opinion
DeProfio v. Office of the Director of Regulation
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided June 28, 2004No. GDTC-AA-03-118-FOEPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
EAGAN, Judge.
The plaintiff brought the present action alleging that the suspension of his gaming license and barring from the Mohegan Sun Casino was improper. The suspension was the result of an investigation conducted by the Security Department of the Mohegan Sun Casino involving alleged illegal activity on the part of patrons and employees of the Mohegan Sun Poker Room. The al*314leged activities included the purchase and use of illegal substances, marijuana and the trafficking and use of prescription controlled drugs in the Poker Room. The plaintiff, Paul DeProfio was identified as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Pineiro v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1999
- Kochachy v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
- La Pietra v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- Izbicki v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009
- Greis v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009