Legal Opinion
Strong v. Conservation Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 6, 1993No. 14611PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
In this appeal concerning a conservation commission’s denial of an inland wetlands application, we granted a petition for certification to consider whether the Appellate Court had improperly placed on the commission the burden of establishing that no feasible and prudent alternative existed to the plaintiff’s application.1 We dismiss the appeal on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The opinion of the Appellate Court, Strong v. Conservation Commission, 28 Conn. App. 435, 611 A.2d 427 (1992), discloses the relevant history. The plaintiffs, William Strong and Isabel Strong,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strong v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. NovoaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Strong v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- United Jewish Center v. Town of BrookfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.