Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Arce v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2005No. 2004-0675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellee Hirzel Canning Company, Inc. turns cabbage into sauerkraut. This process requires the cabbages to be cored. To do so, Hirzel uses four Smith cabbage-coring machines. Used universally by the industry, the Smith coring machine is a large, seemingly stationary machine with an operator’s platform, loading station, rotating coring knife, and a discharge station that moves the cored cabbage onto a conveyor belt for further processing. While it is not clear when all of these machines were placed into service at Hirzel, it is agreed that the one germane to this litigation was placed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Cunningham v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Colliver v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. International Truck Engine Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 07ap-547 (6-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Lange v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API