Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gilbert v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2007No. 2006-1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We must determine whether appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio abused its discretion in finding that appellee American Hood Cleaning II, Inc. (“AHC”) did not violate former Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-17(F)(l), a specific safety requirement. Because we find that the commission did not abuse its discretion, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 2} AHC specializes in cleaning commercial kitchen exhaust systems. Part of the process involves the use of a chemical stripper to remove accumulated grease and dust. According to AHC President Dan Branigan, the chemical *244stripper was mixed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Scott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Ex Rel. Scott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Scott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Shelly Co. v. SteigerwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API